<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Life Science Digest&#187; Impax Laboratories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lifesciencedigest.com/tag/impax-laboratories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lifesciencedigest.com</link>
	<description>MD Becker Partners&#039; newsletter covering the life science industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:39:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>2009: Biotech’s Stealth Small Cap Rally</title>
		<link>http://lifesciencedigest.com/2010/01/03/2009-biotech%e2%80%99s-stealth-small-cap-rally/</link>
		<comments>http://lifesciencedigest.com/2010/01/03/2009-biotech%e2%80%99s-stealth-small-cap-rally/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 01:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MD Becker Partners</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amgen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMGN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMLN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amylin Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIIB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biogen Idec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BTK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CELG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celgene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dendreon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNDN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enzon Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GENZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genzyme General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GILD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilead Sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GTx Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GTXI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HGSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Genome Sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impax Laboratories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPXL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASDAQ Biotech Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPS Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPSP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYSE Arca Biotechnology Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OGXI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oncogenex Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osiris Therapeutics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PGNX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progenics Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salix Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santarus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLXP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNGX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soligenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanda Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VNDA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdbpartners.com/blog/?p=526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the heels of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) logging its worst annual performance since 1931 and the NASDAQ Composite (COMP) having its worst year since inception in 1971, it may have seemed counter intuitive to provide a bullish outlook for the biotechnology industry in 2009.  Nonetheless, at the start of the year we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mdbpartners.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/2213668-small.jpg"></a><a href="http://lifesciencedigest.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/2213668-small.jpg"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-574" title="Biotechnology word cloud" src="http://lifesciencedigest.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/2213668-small-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>On the heels of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) logging its worst annual performance since 1931 and the NASDAQ Composite (COMP) having its worst year since inception in 1971, it may have seemed counter intuitive to provide a bullish outlook for the biotechnology industry in 2009.  Nonetheless, at the start of the year we provided a <a href="http://mdbpartners.com/blog/2009/01/07/2009-positive-perspectives-for-biotechnology/" target="_blank">positive outlook for biotechnology</a>, citing the sector’s defensive characteristics, favorable technical aspects, and improving fundamentals, such as the number of new product approvals, products in clinical trials and the brisk pace of industry consolidation and licensing transactions.</p>
<p>With 2009 officially on the books, it appears an appropriate time to review the sector’s performance along with some of the themes highlighted in our previous articles.</p>
<p><strong>Big Versus Small</strong></p>
<p>The twenty-member NYSE Arca Biotechnology Index (BTK) was up 46% in 2009, while the broader NASDAQ Biotech Index (NBI) was only up 16%, underperforming the Dow Jones Industrial Average (INDU), S&amp;P 500 (SPX), and NASDAQ Composite (COMP), which were up 19%, 24%, and 44%, respectively.  Why the huge discrepancy in returns between these two major biotechnology indices?  Unlike the equal-weighted NYSE Arca Biotechnology Index, the NASDAQ Biotech Index is market value-weighted, taking into account the total market capitalization of the companies it tracks and not just their share prices.  Accordingly, companies with the largest market capitalizations, or the greatest values, will have the highest weighting in the index.</p>
<p>During 2009, large capitalization biotechnology companies [<em>greater than $10 billion</em>] dramatically underperformed their smaller peers.  For example, Celgene Corporation (CELG) was essentially flat, Amgen, Inc. (AMGN) was down 2%, Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) declined by 15%, and Genzyme Corporation (GENZ) dropped 26% [earning Henri Termeer the coveted <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10627877/genzymes-termeer-worst-biotech-ceo-of-09.html" target="_blank">Nance Trophy for worst biotech CEO of 2009 by TheStreet.com’s Adam Feuerstein</a>].  Some of the reasons for this poor performance include concerns over generic competition and pipeline progress &#8211; ironically some of the same issues that have plagued big pharma.</p>
<p>Accordingly, the relative underperformance of large capitalization biotechnology companies in 2009 masked the fact that many smaller, innovative companies performed well, with 20 of the 125 companies comprising the NASDAQ Biotech Index producing triple-digit returns during the period.  In fact, two biotechnology companies were among the largest percentage gainers in the NASDAQ Composite with their staggering quadruple-digit returns: Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (VNDA) +2,150% and Human Genome Sciences, Inc. (HGSI) +1,342%.  See Table 1 for a list of the top ten gainers from the NASDAQ Biotech Index in 2009.</p>
<p>Table 1. Top ten gainers from NASDAQ Biotech Index (NBI) in 2009</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="235" valign="top"><strong>Company Name</strong></td>
<td width="84" valign="top"><strong>Symbol</strong></td>
<td width="114" valign="top"><strong>12/31/08 Close</strong></td>
<td width="108" valign="top"><strong>12/31/09 Close</strong></td>
<td width="97" valign="top"><strong>% Change</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="235" valign="top">Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">VNDA</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">$0.500</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">$11.250</td>
<td width="97" valign="top">2,150%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="235" valign="top">Human Genome Sciences, Inc.</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">HGSI</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">$2.120</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">$30.580</td>
<td width="97" valign="top">1,342%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="235" valign="top">Targacept, Inc.</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">TRGT</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">$3.560</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">$20.900</td>
<td width="97" valign="top">487%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="235" valign="top">Dendreon Corporation</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">DNDN</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">$4.580</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">$26.280</td>
<td width="97" valign="top">474%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="235" valign="top">Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc.</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">HITK</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">$5.540</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">$28.050</td>
<td width="97" valign="top">406%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="235" valign="top">BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">BCRX</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">$1.370</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">$6.460</td>
<td width="97" valign="top">372%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="235" valign="top">Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">SPPI</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">$1.490</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">$4.440</td>
<td width="97" valign="top">198%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="235" valign="top">Santarus, Inc.</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">SNTS</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">$1.570</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">$4.620</td>
<td width="97" valign="top">194%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="235" valign="top">Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">SLXP</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">$8.830</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">$25.390</td>
<td width="97" valign="top">188%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="235" valign="top">Impax Laboratories, Inc.</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">IPXL</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">$5.000</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">$13.610</td>
<td width="97" valign="top">172%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Oncology: Prostate Cancer Spotlight</strong></p>
<p>Driven by positive Phase 3 results from Dendreon Corporation (DNDN) regarding its prostate cancer vaccine study, investors gravitated towards biotechnology companies working in the field of prostate cancer treatment as noted in our <a href="http://mdbpartners.com/blog/2009/05/31/biotech-stocks-and-the-asco-effect/" target="_blank">May 2009 article</a>.  This enthusiasm only increased when Johnson &amp; Johnson (JNJ) announced in May 2009 that it would acquire Cougar Biotechnology, Inc., a development stage company with an oral prostate cancer treatment being studied in two Phase 3 clinical trials, for approximately $1 billion. </p>
<p>While not a member of either major biotechnology index, shares of Oncogenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OGXI) started the year around $3.00 and ended above $22 for a 643% return.  Oncogenex is developing OGX-011, which is designed to inhibit the production of clusterin, a protein that is associated with cancer treatment resistance, and has completed Phase 2 clinical trials in prostate, lung and breast cancer.  OGX-011 received Fast Track designation from the FDA for the treatment of progressive metastatic prostate cancer in combination with docetaxel.  Shares of Oncogenex had traded higher than $42 in August 2009, but the stock price declined following a license agreement with Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) for OGX-011 that apparently did not meet investor’s expectations.</p>
<p>Not all biotechnology companies working in the area of prostate cancer were as fortunate as Dendreon, Cougar, and Oncogenex.  Shares of GTx, Inc. (GTXI) were the second largest industry decliner for 2009 due to a complete response letter from the Food and Drug Administration [FDA] that cited clinical deficiencies regarding the company’s New Drug Application [NDA] for toremifene 80 mg to reduce fractures in men with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy.  See Table 2 for a list of the top ten decliners from the NASDAQ Biotech Index in 2009.</p>
<p><strong>Shareholder Activist Wins</strong></p>
<p>In view of past major coups with MedImmune and ImClone, in <a href="http://mdbpartners.com/blog/2009/08/30/three-recent-biotechnology-activist-wins-by-carl-icahn/" target="_blank">August 2009 we reviewed Carl Icahn’s biotechnology holdings</a> as reported in SEC filings and identified three companies that significantly underperformed the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index over the past five years, but with recent successful shareholder activist outcomes that could positively impact future performance.  In particular, we noted that Alexander Denner, who has served as Managing Director of entities affiliated with Carl Icahn and as a director of ImClone, had recently been elected as a director at each company.</p>
<p>During 2009, those three companies, Biogen Idec, Inc. (BIIB), Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLN), and Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ENZN) produced positive returns of 12%, 31% and 81%, respectively.  While Biogen Idec underperformed the sector, it notched the highest return among large capitalization biotechnology companies.</p>
<p>In other shareholder activist news, holders of Vanda Pharmaceuticals (VNDA) are likely pleased that the company’s Board of Directors spurned a request by Tang Capital Partners, LP to liquidate the company in February 2009.  Shares of Vanda were up 2,150% for the year [see Table 1] following FDA approval in May 2009 to market the company’s Fanapt™ [iloperidone], a novel antipsychotic for the acute treatment of adult patients with schizophrenia, and a subsequent marketing agreement for the product with Novartis AG (NVS).</p>
<p><strong>CNS: Developments for Parkinson’s Disease</strong></p>
<p>Vanda Pharmaceuticals wasn’t the only company working in the area of central nervous system [CNS] disorders to make news.  Shares of Impax Laboratories, Inc. (IPXL), which were trading around $7.50 at the time we published our August 2009 article titled “<a href="http://mdbpartners.com/blog/2009/08/02/treating-parkinson%e2%80%99s-disease-investment-opportunities-and-challenges/" target="_blank">Treating Parkinson’s Disease: Investment Opportunities and Challenges</a>,” continued to reach new 52-week highs and ended up 172% for the year [see Table 1].  Impax recently initiated the second of two Phase 3 studies designed to support marketing approval of its IPX066 product candidate for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease.  IPX066 is an investigational extended release carbidopa-levodopa product intended to rapidly achieve and then sustain effective blood concentrations of levodopa, potentially improving clinical symptom management.</p>
<p><strong>Gastrointestinal Disease: 3 Hits, 3 Misses</strong></p>
<p>First, the good:</p>
<p>Both Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (SLXP) and Santarus, Inc. (SNTS) appear in the list of top ten biotechnology gainers for 2009 with triple-digit returns due to favorable regulatory progress reported during the year [see Table 1].  In September, Salix announced the successful outcome of two Phase 3 trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xifaxan® [rifaximin] for the treatment of non-constipation irritable bowel syndrome.  Salix is planning an NDA submission for the first half of 2010.  In December, Santarus announced that the FDA approved the company’s New Drug Application [NDA] for its prescription tablet product for all of the indications being sought, including for the treatment of heartburn and other symptoms associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease. </p>
<p>While not a member of either major biotechnology index, shares of Soligenix, Inc. (SNGX.OB) increased 317% during 2009.  In January, the company reached agreement with the FDA on the design of a confirmatory, pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial evaluating its lead product orBec® for the treatment of acute gastrointestinal Graft-versus-Host Disease [GVHD].  The following month, Soligenix announced a potential $30 million North American partnership agreement with Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals for orBec and in October 2009 initiated patient enrollment in the confirmatory Phase 3 trial that is expected to complete with clinical data available in the first half of 2011.</p>
<p>Next, the bad:</p>
<p>As discussed in our December 2009 article “<a href="http://mdbpartners.com/blog/2009/12/09/graft-versus-host-disease-failures-and-future-opportunities/" target="_blank">Graft Versus Host Disease: Failures and Future Opportunities</a>,” Osiris Therapeutics, Inc. (OSIR) recently reported preliminary results from two Phase 3 trials evaluating its Prochymal product candidate for the treatment of acute GVHD.  Unfortunately, neither trial reached its primary endpoint, sending shares from $14 to a 52-week low of $5.35 by November 2009, earning the company a spot in the top ten decliners for the year [see Table 2]. </p>
<p>The other two casualties working in the area of gastrointestinal disease and appearing in the top ten decliners for 2009 are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (PGNX), which announced in October 2009 that the company regained worldwide rights to Relistor® [methylnaltrexone bromide] for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation from Wyeth Pharmaceuticals.  Global net sales of Relistor for the third quarter of 2009 were a mere $3.3 million, as compared to $3.2 million in sales for the previous quarter.</li>
<li>In the absence of any negative clinical or regulatory news, NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NPSP) stated it remains on track to reach full patient enrollment before the end of the first quarter of 2010 for a confirmatory Phase 3 trial with Gattex™ (teduglutide), the company’s proprietary analog of naturally occurring human glucagon-like peptide 2 [GLP-2], for the treatment of short bowel syndrome [SBS].  NPS believes that positive results from the trial, expected to complete in October 2010 according to <a href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/" target="_blank">ClinicalTrials.gov</a>, will enable the company to seek U.S. marketing approval for Gattex.</li>
</ul>
<p>Table 2. Top ten decliners from NASDAQ Biotech Index (NBI) in 2009</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="235" valign="top"><strong>Company Name</strong></td>
<td width="84" valign="top"><strong>Symbol</strong></td>
<td width="114" valign="top"><strong>12/31/08 Close</strong></td>
<td width="108" valign="top"><strong>12/31/09 Close</strong></td>
<td width="97" valign="top"><strong>% Change</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="235" valign="top">Sequenom, Inc.</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">SQNM</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">$19.840</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">$4.140</td>
<td width="97" valign="top">-79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="235" valign="top">GTx, Inc.</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">GTXI</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">$16.840</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">$4.200</td>
<td width="97" valign="top">-75%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="235" valign="top">MiddleBrook Pharmaceuticals, Inc.</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">MBRK</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">$1.500</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">$0.510</td>
<td width="97" valign="top">-66%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="235" valign="top">Idenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc.</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">IDIX</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">$5.790</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">$2.150</td>
<td width="97" valign="top">-63%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="235" valign="top">Osiris Therapeutics, Inc.</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">OSIR</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">$19.160</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">$7.140</td>
<td width="97" valign="top">-63%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="235" valign="top">Progenics Pharmaceuticals Inc.</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">PGNX</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">$10.310</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">$4.440</td>
<td width="97" valign="top">-57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="235" valign="top">Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc.</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">QCOR</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">$9.310</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">$4.750</td>
<td width="97" valign="top">-49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="235" valign="top">NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc.</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">NPSP</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">$6.210</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">$3.400</td>
<td width="97" valign="top">-45%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="235" valign="top">Discovery Laboratories, Inc.</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">DSCO</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">$1.120</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">$0.628</td>
<td width="97" valign="top">-44%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="235" valign="top">The Medicines Company</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">MDCO</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">$14.730</td>
<td width="108" valign="top">$8.340</td>
<td width="97" valign="top">-43%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>2010 Outlook</strong></p>
<p>The capital markets remain turbulent and there may be casualties along the way among undercapitalized companies, but many of the biotechnology industry’s fundamentals, such as the number of products in clinical trials, new product approvals, profitable biotech companies and industry mergers &amp; acquisitions remain favorable for 2010. Similar to 2009, small capitalization companies with clinical or regulatory catalysts should continue to outperform their larger industry peers in the year ahead.</p>
<p>What is your outlook for the biotechnology industry in 2010?  Take a moment to complete our survey, which is only ten questions long and will take just minutes to complete.  The results of this important survey along with our industry outlook will be communicated in early 2010 through a future article.  Take the survey now by <a href="http://survey.constantcontact.com/survey/a07e2npox8cg37mc3rt/start" target="_blank">clicking here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lifesciencedigest.com/2010/01/03/2009-biotech%e2%80%99s-stealth-small-cap-rally/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Developments for Parkinson&#8217;s Disease Ignite Investor Enthusiasm</title>
		<link>http://lifesciencedigest.com/2009/11/15/new-data-ignites-investor-enthusiasm-for-parkinson%e2%80%99s-disease/</link>
		<comments>http://lifesciencedigest.com/2009/11/15/new-data-ignites-investor-enthusiasm-for-parkinson%e2%80%99s-disease/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MD Becker Partners</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[afegostat tartrate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amicus Therapeutics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BioSante Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CERE-120]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ceregene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cogane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOLD. Plicera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaucher's disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glucocerebrosidase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impax Laboratories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPX066]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPXL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[levodopa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael J. Fox Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neeurotrophic factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neurologix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLX-P101]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NP201]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRGX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NuPathe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxford BioMedica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parkinson's disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phytopharm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProSavin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shire plc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SHPGY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SRDX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SurModics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdbpartners.com/blog/?p=490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In our August 2009 article titled “Treating Parkinson’s Disease: Investment Opportunities and Challenges,” we reviewed some of the historical challenges associated with developing treatments for Parkinson’s disease [PD] and cited reasons for optimism going forward in addition to highlighting several promising companies making progress. Since that time, many of the companies we featured have reported [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://lifesciencedigest.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/948077-small.jpg"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-321" title="948077-small" src="http://lifesciencedigest.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/948077-small-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>In our August 2009 article titled “<a href="http://lifesciencedigest.com/2009/08/02/treating-parkinson%e2%80%99s-disease-investment-opportunities-and-challenges/">Treating Parkinson’s Disease: Investment Opportunities and Challenges</a>,” we reviewed some of the historical challenges associated with developing treatments for Parkinson’s disease [PD] and cited reasons for optimism going forward in addition to highlighting several promising companies making progress. Since that time, many of the companies we featured have reported clinical progress, presented promising new data, and produced significant returns for investors – with several stocks reaching 52-week highs. In view of renewed investor enthusiasm for companies working in the area of PD, the purpose of this article is to provide an update on previously mentioned companies and introduce some new players that are making headlines in the PD space.</p>
<p><strong>Improvements on Existing Therapies</strong></p>
<p>Levodopa [L-dopa] is one of the most commonly prescribed medicines for PD. L-dopa initially reduces the symptoms of slowness, stiffness and tremor associated with PD; over time the dose of L-dopa needs to be increased often resulting in drug related complications. Several biopharmaceutical companies are developing new drug formulations of currently approved medicines:</p>
<p><em>Impax Laboratories, Inc.</em></p>
<p>Shares of Impax Laboratories, Inc. (IPXL), which were trading around $7.50 at the time our initial PD article published, recently reached a new 52-week high of $10.86, representing a 45% increase in a matter of months. The company recently initiated a multinational Phase III trial of its late-stage drug candidate IPX066 in advanced PD patients. IPX066 is an investigational extended release carbidopa-levodopa product intended to rapidly achieve and then sustain effective blood concentrations of levodopa, potentially improving PD clinical symptom management. This is the second of two Phase III studies designed to support marketing approval of IPX066 in Parkinson’s disease. In June 2009, Impax reported the initiation of the first Phase III study of IPX066 in treatment naïve PD patients.</p>
<p><em>Nupathe Inc. and SurModics, Inc.</em></p>
<p>Privately-held Nupthe Inc., a neuroscience-focused specialty pharmaceutical company, recently announced a partnership with SurModics, Inc. (SRDX), a leading provider of drug delivery and surface modifications to the healthcare industry, for development of NP201. NP201 is a biodegradable sustained release formulation of an approved dopamine agonist and the first long-acting treatment available in broadly acceptable dose form that maintains the potential to provide sustained relief from Parkinson’s disease without motor response complications. NP201 leverages NuPathe’s long-acting delivery [LAD™] technology and SurModics’ proprietary biodegradable polymer matrix implant technology to achieve optimal drug release over an extended period of time. NP201 consists of a dopamine agonist formulated to provide effective relief of the signs and symptoms of Parkinson’s disease [e.g., tremor, rigidity, postural instability] for 1-3 months with a single administration. By providing stable, continuous drug delivery over an extended period, NP201 may significantly decrease the dose complications associated with current treatments. Furthermore, many researchers believe that continuous, stable stimulation of the dopamine receptors may slow the progression of the disease.</p>
<p><strong>Neurotrophic Factors and Gene Therapy</strong></p>
<p>Neurotrophic factors are a family of proteins responsible for the growth and survival of developing neurons and the maintenance of mature neurons. Neurotrophic factors represent an attractive drug class because of their anti-apoptotic properties*. Several classes of neurotrophic factors exist, each with unique pharmacodynamic properties. Investigators are still in the process of understanding the different receptor targets of these proteins and the downstream cellular responses; therefore, the best individual or combination of neurotrophic factors is not yet known. Despite these challenges, several companies are proceeding with development of this promising class of drugs.</p>
<p>Local administration of neurotrophic growth factors is required to achieve therapeutic concentrations in the target tissue, although the site of administration and method of delivery have represented significant historical barriers. We believe gene therapy is among the more promising delivery alternatives for companies seeking to restore abnormal cellular signaling, especially in diseases with difficult to reach targets such as PD, and several companies have demonstrated considerable progress.</p>
<p><em>Ceregene, Inc.</em></p>
<p>Just a few days after our original PD article published in August, privately-held Ceregene, Inc. announced that the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research [MJFF] will provide funds for long-term follow-up testing of patients enrolled in the company’s Phase II trial of CERE-120. CERE-120 is an adeno-associated virus [AAV] carrying the gene for neurturin [NRTN], a naturally occurring neurotrophic factor that repairs damaged and dying dopamine-secreting neurons. The funding will enable Ceregene to collect and analyze more extensive data for up to 48 months from patients with advanced PD who were enrolled in the double-blind, controlled trial which ended in November 2008. The Phase II trial involved 52 patients and failed to demonstrate a difference in the primary endpoint in treated versus the control group. However, the study suggested improvements in secondary endpoints at 12 months. Based on those findings, and insight gained from analyses of post-mortem brain tissue from two CERE-120 treated patients, the company has revised the dosing regimen and expects to initiate a new trial of CERE-120 in the near future.</p>
<p>In October 2009, BioSante Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BPAX) completed its merger with Cell Genesys, Inc. and now owns a sixteen [16] percent equity ownership position in Ceregene, a former subsidiary of Cell Genesys.</p>
<p><em>Phytopharm plc</em></p>
<p>Phytopharm plc (LSE: PYM) is developing Cogane™, a novel non-peptide, orally bioavailable neurotrophic factor inducer that readily crosses the blood brain barrier. In preclinical models, Cogane reverses the changes in the area of the brain involved in Parkinson&#8217;s disease by inducing the body&#8217;s own production of neurotrophic factors including glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor [GDNF].</p>
<p>Phytopharm recently announced two positive results from studies for Cogane. In the first study, funded by a grant from MJFF, Cogane demonstrated efficacy in a preclinical study using a non-clinical, non-human primate model of PD resulting in a 43% reduction in parkinsonian disability. In the second study, the company reported Phase 1b, 28-day safety data demonstrating that Cogane was well tolerated, with blood levels of Cogane reaching efficacy levels seen in the non-human primate model. The promising results, although still early in clinical development, demonstrate the scientific and financial interest in this biologic pathway and a Phase II, proof-of-concept study for Cogane is planned to commence in the second quarter of 2010.</p>
<p>Shares of Phytopharm soared more than 300% to a new 52-week high of 26.95 pence on the news.</p>
<p><em>Oxford BioMedica</em></p>
<p>Oxford BioMedica (LSE: OXB) recently presented data that positions the company at the forefront of gene therapy for PD. Oxford BioMedica recently announced new data from the ongoing Phase I/II trial of ProSavin®, its novel gene therapy for the treatment of PD. All patients treated at the second dose level have completed their six-month assessments and have shown further improvement in motor function. The maximum improvement was 53% and the average was 34% relative to patients&#8217; pre-treatment motor function. The Principal Investigator, Professor Stéphane Palfi of the Henri Mondor Hospital in Paris, is expected to present interim results from the trial at the European Society of Gene &amp; Cell Therapy Annual Congress, being held November 21-25, 2009, in Hannover, Germany.</p>
<p>In addition, Oxford BioMedica recently released preclinical studies demonstrating increased dopamine production without the addition of L-DOPA resulting in decreased disease severity without the dyskinesias associated with L-DOPA [1]. Movement and posture were significantly improved after two weeks [p &lt; 0.05], reaching 77% and 85% of respective normal levels. Overall, these preclinical data suggest that ProSavin may offer significant benefit in the clinical setting, treating the primary symptoms of Parkinson&#8217;s disease as well as reducing the severe side-effects of long-term L-DOPA therapy. These conclusions are supported by initial data from human clinical trials.</p>
<p>Oxford BioMedica has clearly taken the lead in the race for novel PD therapies. In addition to the excellent safety profile, ProSavin delivers three genes, AADC [aromatic amino acid decarboxylase], TH [tyrosine hydroxylase] and CH1 [GTP-cyclohydrolase 1], addressing multiple protein targets associated with PD pathophysiology. As Oxford BioMedica continues clinical development, including dosing optimization, this therapy could potentially offer long-term improvements in patients afflicted with PD.</p>
<p>Shares of Oxford BioMedica, which were trading around 10.00 pence at the time our original PD article published, more than doubled and reached a new 52-week high of 21.75 pence on the news, resulting in upgrades from research analysts.</p>
<p><em>Neurologix, Inc.</em></p>
<p>Neurologix, Inc. (NRGX) is developing NLX-P101, an AAV vector delivering an inhibitory therapeutic gene [glutamic acid decarboxylase, or “GAD”] which is inserted in the subthalmic nucleus [STN]. In its third quarter of 2009 financial results press release, Neurologix reported that its Data Monitoring Committee held its second meeting to review the progress of the ongoing Phase II study of NLX-P101 and recommended that the trial continue unmodified. Despite having one of the most clinically advanced gene therapy solutions for PD, Neurologix also disclosed that the company must secure additional funding by December 31, 2009, or shortly thereafter, otherwise its ability to continue as a “going concern” may be in doubt. While the company remains on track to complete all surgeries for the Phase II study before year-end, the first efficacy results from this trial won’t be available until around mid-year 2010.</p>
<p><strong>Link Between Gaucher’s Disease and PD Published</strong></p>
<p>Recent clinical data has demonstrated that a mutation in the gene encoding glucocerebrosidase [GBA] in patients with PD is the most common genetic risk factor for Parkinson’s disease identified to date. The lysosomal enzyme GBA is deficient in patients with Gaucher’s disease; lack of a functional copy of GBA results in accumulation of glucocerebroside in many tissues including the liver, lungs, brain, and spleen. In a recent New England Journal of Medicine [NEJM] article, 20% of Ashkenazi Jewish Patients and 7% of Non–Ashkenazi Jewish Patients were found to be carriers of a GBA mutation [2]. Patients with a GBA mutation presented earlier with the disease, were more likely to have affected relatives, and were more likely to have atypical clinical manifestations.</p>
<p><em>Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.</em></p>
<p>Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (FOLD) recently presented data demonstrating a correlation between GBA and alpha-synuclein, an upregulated PD protein that can form aggregated insoluble amyloid fibrils and neuronal toxicity. Alpha-synuclein up-regulation and aggregation has previously been shown to be critical in the development of PD. Amicus’ in vivo data shows that increasing GBA activity re-established alpha-synuclein homeostasis. In a mouse model overexpressing alpha-synuclein, Amicus was able to restore normal synuclein levels by increasing the GBA activity with Plicera™ [afegostat tartrate], the company’s experimental, oral therapy for the treatment of Gaucher disease that belongs to a class of molecules known as pharmacological chaperones.</p>
<p>This is important for two reasons: 1) by restoring GBA activity to normal levels, this could potentially decrease the risk of PD for patients with a GBA genetic mutation and 2) in patients that are not carriers [i.e. normal GBA but elevated synucleins], the preclinical data has shown that increasing GBA activity above normal levels restores alpha-synuclein levels, possibly slowing disease progression. Amicus, which has also received funding support from MJFF, plans to continue its preclinical chaperone molecule optimization, including Plicera, in an in vivo PD motor deficit model.</p>
<p>Success in this area could reignite investor interest in Amicus, which recently announced negative results from a Phase II trial with Plicera in Gaucher’s disease. The genetic link between GBA and PD is clear and although the direct molecular relationship between these two proteins in not completely understood, GBA is a new and attractive therapeutic target for PD. Importantly, in the Phase II trial for Gaucher’s disease, Amicus demonstrated an increase in GBA activity in those patients receiving Plicera and the company recently reacquired global development and commercialization rights to the product candidate from Shire plc (SHPGY).</p>
<p>Amicus has a clear lead in developing small molecules that increase GBA activity and despite the Gaucher’s disease trial setback, complete GBA restoration may not be needed to restore normal synuclein levels. Amicus will continue with lead optimization for GBA in the brain, including Plicera, for the treatment of PD along with other GBA chaperone molecules. Clearly, Plicera is an attractive lead compound because much of the preclinical and phase I safety studies have been completed and it has been shown to cross the blood brain barrier.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>
<p>While treatment of PD is complex due to the disease location, difficulty in clinical trials, and multiple causes of pathophysiology, investor enthusiasm for companies working in this area is warranted in view of recent progress.</p>
<p>Several companies, such as Impax Laboratories and Nupathe, are developing new drug formulations of currently approved medicines. If approved, these drugs could improve the side effect profiles of the FDA approved medicines. From an investor&#8217;s perspective, these companies are attractive since the FDA approval process will be much more straightforward and physician acceptance will be high because these drugs are an improvement on a known drug class.</p>
<p>Other companies, although generally earlier in development, are using neurotrophic factors and gene therapy approaches to directly address the disease mechanism. While much riskier, these new technologies could drastically change the disease outcomes of those patients afflicted with this debilitating disease. Speed to market combined with superior efficacy will be critical for high market penetration.</p>
<p><em>* Neurotrophic factors were discovered in 1948 in the brain. Originally thought to be exclusive to the brain, these peptides are now found to have broader applications in other cell types and locations. Due to their pharmacodynamic properties such as reducing ER stress, neurotrophic factors possess anti-apoptotic properties and could serve as therapies for many diseases such as myocardial infarctions/ischemia and stroke.</em></p>
<p>References:</p>
<ol>
<li>Sci Transl Med. 14 October 2009 1:2ps2</li>
<li>N Engl J Med. 22 October 2009;361(17):1651-61</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lifesciencedigest.com/2009/11/15/new-data-ignites-investor-enthusiasm-for-parkinson%e2%80%99s-disease/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

